• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Voice at the Table

State Government funded training with resources for Government and Peer Advisors

Text Size Contrast
  • Home
  • About
    • Consumer Advocates
    • VATT in Community Organisations
    • VATT in Government
  • Training
    • Request for Training
  • Resources
  • Get Involved
  • Contact

Evaluation: Doing it Better

Speech Bubble

“A clear, simple evaluation plan designed at the start of a project can help you to assess whether you’re achieving what you want to achieve, and what you can do to improve your work.”

Community Development Evaluation Manual STARTTS 2016

 

Evaluation is an important part of the consumer participation process. From the beginning it is a good idea to identify and adopt an evaluation model which best suits your organisation. There are numerous evaluation models available. Many are based on the principles of action research and actively engage consumers in the process.

 

The following evaluation model was adapted from the Australian Government Cancer Australia

 

Types of evaluation

Three basic types of evaluation can be used for consumer participation strategies or activities.

  1. Evaluation of the process: looking at all the processes involved in the activity as well as the immediate effects including:
  • How was the experience for consumers and what were the immediate effects for them?
  • Who were the consumers and how well did they represent the target group?
  • What was the consumers’ level of satisfaction with the project?
  • What additional activities were undertaken in response to the needs of consumers?

 

  1. Evaluation of the impact: focuses on the short-term impact of the activity and is usually related to the objectives of the activity, including:
  • Were the purpose, aims and objectives achieved?
  • Were the consumer participation strategies or activities effective to gather the required information?
  • Was the implementation of the activity achieved within the budget and timelines and were the skills sufficient to implement the project adequately?
  • Were there any unintended effects of the activity?
  • Were the results disseminated as planned?

 

  1. Evaluation of outcomes: identifies the long-term outcomes of an activity. Thus, outcome evaluation would assess whether a program has achieved its main aim, the conditions required to implement this aim successfully in the future, and whether the conditions to successfully achieve an aim can be reproduced in the future.

 

Evaluation Tools

A variety of tools can be used for evaluation. The selection of tools is dependent upon the aims of the evaluation, timeframe, resources and skills of staff. Tools that can be used for evaluation may include:

  • Documents – minutes, reports, newsletters
  • Story-telling
  • Focus group interviews and discussions
  • Informal feedback
  • ‘Exit’ interviews
  • Observation
  • Face-to-face or telephone interviews
  • Self-completed questionnaires
  • Photos
  • Statistics
  • Feedback
  • Personal narratives

Menu: Consumer Participation Kit

  • Join Our Mailing List

    Enter your name and email address to stay up to date on the latest news.

  • Footer

    Contact Us

    Ground Floor, Ross House,
    247 Flinders Lane
    Melbourne VIC 3000

    Email Us

    About

    • About VATT
    • Why is VATT So Important?
    • Relevance to Government
    • The VATT Film
    • Get Involved

    Resources

    • Events
    • Link and Resources
    • Sitemap

    Connect With Us

    • YouTube
    Winner of the 2019 Victorian Disability Awards

    Voice at the Table is the 2019 Winner of the Victorian Disability Awards – Excellence in creating inclusive communities.

    SARU logo Victorian State Government

    Copyright © 2020 Voice at the Table - Project of the Self - Advocacy Resource Unit (SARU)
    VATT would like to acknowledge support from the Victorian State Government - Website by Clickify

    Creative Commons Licence Attribution /Share Alike 4.0 International.